Featured

Attention: Readers

“Open Letters” is another of my ongoing columns, a catch-all collection of not-quite-hate mail addressed to those in a position to make best use of it. It’s not just a complaining rant b

Read More
Attention: Readers

2011 Movie Recap

Here it is, my rundown of the films of 2011. There wasn’t enough to form a really awesome “Top Ten” or whatever, so I’ve just offered a quick, mostly rushed and poorly-written recap of each in

Read More
2011 Movie Recap

Top Songs of 2011

Here’s a recap of 20 or so songs that made it into my regular rotation in 2011. Keep in mind that music reviews like this are pretty damn subjective (much more than book, film or breakfast cereal re

Read More
Top Songs of 2011

Actual Information: Car Insurance

“Actual Information” is another of my ongoing columns, an attempt to produce material that’s a little more practical for my army of reader(s). I’m not wasting time citing sourc

Read More
Actual Information: Car Insurance

Open Letters: Attention Megalomaniacs

“Open Letters” is another of my ongoing columns, a catch-all collection of not-quite-hate mail addressed to those in a position to make best use of it. It’s not just a complaining rant b

Read More
Open Letters: Attention Megalomaniacs

Attention: Readers

0
by on January 26, 2012 at 7:00 PM

“Open Letters” is another of my ongoing columns, a catch-all collection of not-quite-hate mail addressed to those in a position to make best use of it. It’s not just a complaining rant but also advice. It’s advice that is unwarranted and likely unwelcome–but still potentially valuable.

*****

A recent trip overseas revealed something important to me. Assuming someone speaks my language and just diving into conversation expectantly really makes me a huge asshole. And while most people might assume that would happen in a foreign country, not everyone realizes that the same thing happens here at home, everyday.

Most of the people I speak to here in the states speak English, so don’t be confused. But very few people speak “Dave”. Far fewer than I imagined. And although it’s a rough lesson, it’s one I’m glad to be learning.

Ever feel you’ve said something that was just your honest point of view, only to find out that you were misunderstood, or even worse, have offended someone? Maybe not by the content but by your delivery? How much does that suck? A shit ton. It sucks a shit ton. And now having said that last bit, I’ve potentially offended profanity-avoiders, sewer workers and the Royal Society of Weights and Measurements.

I sincerely do want to be aware of how what I say is perceived by family, friends, acquaintances, and my legion of devoted readers. (Does legion = “a handful”? I forget.) In my writing, especially in choose-to-read-it stuff like these blog posts, I do have a decent amount of expectation. I want to be authentic, and maybe even expect a little bravery out of those who voluntarily wander in here.

But I’m also past a point of trying to “startle” people just for the sake of a moment’s scandal. The one hurdle I have left is, training those unfamiliar with the shift between sarcasm and seriousness. I’d like to think it’s clear as can be, but the world reinforces for me that the average Joker doesn’t always know which is which.

Is it better to be a little blunt instead of passive aggressive? I think so. Everyone’s time is so fragmented these days, who has time to imply something with every last Facebook post or tweet? But for every open-hearted bit if bluntness, there is still someone else out there who hasn’t made that leap. Who still likes to hid behind inferences, seek out tones and privately take offense.

I suppose we never get to a point where we are honest with everyone. But I’d like to think it’s a worthy endeavor. I’ve recently been told in the same breath that I seem to be a little “less than serious” and “too stern and demanding”. This is a contradiction, at least in Dave terms.

I have certain perspectives to work with, people. I very much want to think of how others perceive me, to be able to reach a wide audience and to prepare for every possible contingency. But if there are 7 billion people, there are 7 billion responses to anticipate. I’d be en even bigger idiot if I thought I could reach them all.

But I want to, dammit. I sometimes wonder how many others there are out there like me. People with a variety of backgrounds, ways of speaking, points of view… but people who have the same desire at the center of their conversation. The wish to be understood, even appreciated AND to appreciate at the same time.

Part of wanting to be authentic and politely blunt is to avoid being vague. So let me be clear, if you are reading this piece, it was not inspired by anything negative you’ve been involved with. In fact, it’s not truly aimed at any one person.

And this is a two way street, party people. I am going to hit and miss in my attempts to be clearer, be more aware(er?) and so on. But at the same time, my expectations of my audience aren’t dismissed either. There’s a part of me that’s always going to expect (at least those of you who know me) to take me with a grain of salt if needed. Know that I very rarely set out to offend (usually my worst goal is to prod or poke fun).

If I can’t reach the world with a certain thought, I’d like to at least like to be well-received by the chosen few who dare admit to know me. And as much as this post has been about me me me, I hope you draw some inspiration from it too.

Because you can be one hard-to-read motherfucker!

, , , , , , , , ,

2011 Movie Recap

0
by on January 5, 2012 at 6:56 PM

Here it is, my rundown of the films of 2011. There wasn’t enough to form a really awesome “Top Ten” or whatever, so I’ve just offered a quick, mostly rushed and poorly-written recap of each in-theater movie I saw in during the year. There’s quite a few I haven’t gotten to yet (as usual), and I’ll either add them later or (more likely) not. The list is in alphabetical order, and has not been edited to remove any embarrassing entries. You’re welcome!

(Movies are rated on a scale of 1.0 – 5.0)

***

Abduction (2.0) – Can’t say I’m baffled why this movie exists. The first Taylor Lautner vehicle (not counting his dad’s Prius), making the most of his Twihype. It’s not good, obviously. But in it’s defense, we all watched shitty movies like this when we were 13… and girls.

African Cats (3.0) – This movie was about animals.

Bad Teacher (3.5) – A rated “R” comedy that fell flat in places because it wasn’t “edgy” as it should have been. Maybe a good eye-opener for you people who always say, “Teachers should all get paid more, I could never do that.” Funny, but disappointing.

Breaking Dawn (2.5) – Before you roll your eyes (too late, right? Abduction did it? Stupid alphabetical lists), it should be obvious which movies on this list were my choice and which were not. That said, I’m sorry for dragging everyone else to see my big movie of 2011. I can finally exhale.

Bridesmaids (3.0) – Funny, but damned if I remember anything. A little disappointed here too. I’m all for women getting a chance to be stupid / selfish / raunchy in their own movie. And hey, that one big girl got her breakout moment in this movie. So there’s that.

Captain America (4.0) – Being generous here, sure. For all the great, two-fisted fun in this film, there were some weaker decisions. Don’t know why, but all the futuristic tech the 1940s-era baddies concocted might be true to pulpy comic book roots, but just felt tired in the post-Hellboy movie environment.

Crazy, Stupid Love (3.5) – Whatever.

Drive (4.0) – A throwback to 80s era man of few words crime flicks. This was great fun, despite having only a handful of “driving” scenes. Ryan Gosling proves he can be in movies that don’t punch me in the kidneys, so that’s another bonus.

Fast Five (4.0) – I liked it a lot as “summer popcorn” fun. My memory of what I loved so damn much has faded over the last few months, but I still recall the feeling of “this is the best of these shitty movies”. Give it a shot. I’ll catch it again on cable myself.

Final Destination 5 (3.5) – All these fucking sequels. This one tried to tie things in with the original, which was probably the best part of the film. I see a lot of crap movies, but this one was one of the series better entries, and miles above that abysmal 4th one. Cause, wow… fuck!

Fright Night (3.0) – Meh. Never saw the original. Such things were prohibited during my youth. This boring remake was apparently prohibited during my waking hours.

Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (3.5) – Yeah, I was looking forward to it. Outside of a few brutal scenes, it was pretty plain as a mystery/investigation story and strangely disposable. I hear much the same from those who read the book(s). Too bad. Not sure what Fincher saw in it besides RAPE.

Hanna (4.5) – This was actually pretty great for what it was. I’d recommend this to all my friends who are considering turning their children into killing machines. And no, I don’t mean via X-Box. Check this one out.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Pt. II  (5.0) – Fuck you. I love these books, these movies and found this to be very rewarding cap to the series. All payoff after last years 7th film spun its wheels for most of its run time. Emotional finale for those invested in it, dismissed only by the soulless or religious wingnuts. Great. But you don’t need my convincing, do you?

Horrible Bosses (2.5) – I saw this comedy film in 2011.

Hugo (4.0) – Scorsese’s love of film bleeds through a sometimes silly, sometimes thoughtful movie. I can’t say this is everyone’s cup of tea, but if you love movies beyond just something to do while stuffing your face with popcorn, you should give this a look.

Ides of March (4.0) – Clooney playing a charismatic politician with enough scandal to shake our natural love for the guy. All this is filtered through the eyes of his campaign aide, Mr. 2011 himself, Ryan-Goddamned Gosling. Been months since I’ve seen it, but if I recall there were other actors in this too, hidden behind all the HANDSOME.

Immortals (3.0) – I love Greek mythology, and am a fan of Tarsem as a visual artist. The story might have left some wanting, and those acclaimed visuals were sometimes ALL there was going for it. It’s 300 meets Clash of the Titans with brighter colors. I dig it, but lowered the score for this mini-review so you don’t think it’s a GREAT MOVIE or anything.

In Time (3.5) – Sci-Fi high-concept always gets me. Time is literally money in this story of oppressed classes and the value of life. Justin Timberlake is proving himself to be decent enough an actor to maybe make the post-pop transition permanent. Like most films in this genre, the plot rarely lives up to the concept, thus the middling score. But it’s fun to watch if only to think about how much time you’ve “spent” watching.

Jane Eyre (3.0) – I’m uncultured and immature, but thanks to this movie, I’m also well-rested.

Kung Fu Panda 2 (3.5) – They made another one!

Limitless (3.0) – See the “In Time” entry above about me and these sci-fi shenanigans. I came for the high-concept, but I stayed because I paid for a ticket. Really though, not terrible. Bradley Cooper is a bonafide movie star. And I think DeNiro was in this? As long as this is the worst thing he does this year I’m cool.

Midnight in Paris (3.0) – I’m not enough of a literary nerd for this to blow me away. But it was fun, fairly lighthearted and all that. Worth a shot actually. The scenes of actual Paris were a nice preview of the city I was fortunate enough to visit a few months afterward in the real world.

Mission Impossible: Ghost Protocol (4.5) – Brad Bird’s first outing directing non-animated characters was great fun. Not perfect, but definitely a solid entry in a series that varies WILDLY according to your taste (Okay, really just the John Woo mess of MI:2 was bad). Still more a Tom Cruise vehicle than a solid “team” movie in the spirit of the show. But fuck that right? MAVERIIIIIICK!

New Year’s Eve (2.0) – See, this is where my DeNiro joke above pays off. He was in this bowl movement. A montage of loosely-connected scenes all neatly tied up at midnight. Yeah it’s easy to hate on movies like this (hastily-assembled, over-cast and crowded, sap-soaked), but it was really harmless. Well, harmless once Sarah Jessica Parker dissolved my retinas.

No Strings Attached (2.0) – I really forgot what this was about for five minutes just now. And for that brief fleeting time, I had hope.

Paul (2.0) – *fart noise*

Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides (3.0) – Pros: Leaner, more focused than the last two bloated CGI-fests. Cons: Making Captain Jack the “main” character defeats the purpose. The series is really starting to show signs of wear (since the second flick, honestly, but here…). I want to believe Depp isn’t a “cash-grab” kind of actor… but when Pirates VIII hits, I will revisit this notion.

Real Steel (4.0) – Wow. That was a lot better and not nearly as cheesy as I had expected. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not impervious to criticism, or anything approaching a “classic” film. But it’s a good time at the movies, and fucking robots fucking fight. Just with fists, not missiles and shit. Holding out for that “Robot Jox” reboot, personally.

Rise of Planet of the Apes (4.5) – If you had told me this would be one of the standout movies of the year, I’d have laughed YOUR head off. But despite the “prequel to a decades old franchise” factor, the presence of Oscar legend James Franco as a serious scientist… I really found this to be worth the hype that early reviewers flung at it (flung, apes… heh). Andy Serkis in a mocap suit continues to impress. Caesar is as real a character as they get, kids.

Scre4m (2.5) – Oh goddammit.

Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows (3.5) – I’ve warmed to Guy Ritchie’s take on the classic detective since the first film. Robert Downey Jr. really is the goods, people. This film made me impatient at times, and I can’t exactly recap the plot for you from memory either. I liked it, didn’t love it. But if it introduces a new generation to a classic, truly iconic character, then so be it.

Source Code (4.5) – More high concept sci-fi here. The story of a man allowed to relive the same few hours at first sounds like Groundhogs Day, but there’s a serious immediacy that helps set this film apart. There’s enough of a twist/reveal for me to avoid going further into it, but it’s not a bad way to spend a couple hours. Even repeatedly.

Sucker Punch (3.0) – Wanted to love this film. Whether you dismiss Zack Snyder as “terrible” or not, I can appreciate what he “means” to do. This film was meant to be bombastic fun, but it’s over-the-top action vignettes actually distract from the more engaging (relatively) main plot. In the end, this is simply not a “good” movie. I still want to like it, but you’d call me braindead if I did.

Super (2.5) – Rainn Wilson as a mental case who decides to fight crime with stunning blasts of enraged, untrained violence. There’s something to be said for a few of the more artistic turns in this movie, but in the end it still seemed to fall flat. Not really boring, but not intriguing or fresh enough take on the “real people become superheroes” subgenre either.

Super 8 (3.0) – E.T. is pissed!

The Adjustment Bureau (2.5) – I think I’ve made it clear that I will see these fucking “concept” pictures by now, regardless of how bad they might be. This wasn’t an abject failure, but just another case of not being all it could have been. The movie I imagined was probably a 4.0 or so.

The Debt (4.0) – A good “team of spies” movie with a young cast competes with their “decades later” older, more troubled selves. This is a film I’d call “solid”, meaning it’s got no major flaws, but at the same time doesn’t take any major chances. I’d honestly have to say that wrapping up its loose ends feels uncomfortable to me, when the story seems set in motion by the idea of open ended failure.

The Descendants (4.5) – I will sing Clooney’s praises as long as he continues to make atypical choices for such a high profile star. This story is a meditation on family connections, what death means and what some of us are willing to do to honor (or whitewash) those we’ve lost.

The Devil’s Double (3.0) – Ridiculous, but fairly fun. A no-name is drafted to double for one of Saddam’s playboy sons. The ensuing fallout from befriending an erratic and dangerous “friend” begin to spiral beyond repair. This makes the film seem a close cousin to many American films of the same stripe. Proving that some vices (money, drugs and of course hos) are universal fucker-uppers. For a film though, these familiarities make it feel all the more forgettable.

The Mechanic (3.0) – This was in 2011? Must’ve been a Jan/Feb movie. Anyway, it was a Statham flick. Take it as such.

The Muppets (4.0) – A chance to revisit these characters strikes the right “tone” of humor (silly at times, irreverent at others) for those who brought nostalgia with them. For newcomers, it’s a harmless, potentially fun little movie. The notion of puppets interacting seamlessly with people (including a smorgasbord of celeb cameos, bork bork bork!) is ALWAYS worth exploring. Whether or not this launches a new era of Muppetry remains to be seen.

The Sitter (2.5) – Was wanting to laugh more. Again, the “rated R comedy” seems to have been neutered somewhere. I imagine there’s a cut of this film that pushed the boundaries out there somewhere. Or it could be that Jonah Hill just isn’t funny. Either way, I was disappointed despite being fairly excited to see this.

Thor (4.0) – I think I’ve grown more fond of this one since the first pass. I’m a Marvel Comics kid from way back, and always wondered how much the real world knew of Thor. Sure people knew Spidey and had at least heard of Captain America. But even more than Iron Man, Thor was a top-tier comics character who seemed to be nonexistent among the gen pop as I saw it. I’m a fan of virtually all the decisions made in set design, even casting. The earth scenes were sadly, the weakest. But it feels like these training wheels will hopefully be off once the Avengers or Thor 2 come ‘round.

Transformers: Dark of the Moon (2.5) – Once I’ve started, I see every movie in a series out of some sense of obligation. Hope I treat my shrink the same way!

Unknown (3.0) – Not quite Taken 2. Caught this a second time on cable… my old movie “twist” frustration seems to have no expiration date. But what do you want from a shoestring-budget, shot-on-location-in-Prague-or-some-shit, face-puncher like this? Eh…

War Horse (4.5) – Yes, Spielberg remains fully capable of Spielberging. Overlooking a few moments of sentiment or coincidence that threatened to snap me out of it, this really was worth the (2.5 hour) time. It can be emotionally compelling if you let it, and if not, it’s a finely crafted, wonderfully scored film. Just see it, bastard.

Water for Elephants (2.5) – I like potato chips.

Winnie the Pooh (3.0) – A lovingly crafted, faithfully developed take on a classic children’s series. I don’t remember a damn thing that happened, though.

X-Men: First Class (4.0) – A better than expected (thanks to the previous films, including that abysmal Wolverine movie) re-imagining / retconned version of the X-Men characters that gets the vast majority of things right. Not stellar, but still a success in my opinion (casting, plot, theme, etc.). Definitely worth a look, even with its shortcomings.

Young Adult (4.5) – A bleak, cynical look at how nostalgia can trump personal evolution. Charlize Theron’s performance is possibly something you might overlook as a former prom queen who refuses to accept a world that has moved on without her divine touch in the decade-plus she’s been in the big city. But I think that’s the triumph of the film (plus another great turn by Patton Oswalt, despite the typecasting) is that refreshing sense of realistic honesty. Dramatic change in personality is the stuff of fiction. And these characters inhabit a often dreary, but real world.

in * Featured, art, movies

, , ,

Top Songs of 2011

0
by on January 4, 2012 at 12:15 AM
Top Songs of 2011

Here’s a recap of 20 or so songs that made it into my regular rotation in 2011. Keep in mind that music reviews like this are pretty damn subjective (much more than book, film or breakfast cereal reviews). A couple loose rules were followed: (A) only list songs that I could lazily confirm were released in 2011, (B) only one song per artist, and of course (C) include a few choices to make me seem “gay”.

This year, I’ve attempted to find YouTube links for each song in case you want to easily confirm I am dumb / tasteless / immature / indeed correct. If you have trouble seeing the videos, trying refreshing the page (F5 on your keyboard). While I am including the videos, my reviews are of the song. In many cases, I hadn’t seen the video until digging it up for your lazy ass. List is alphabetized by song. Enjoy.

Maritime – “Air Arizona”
This was the themesong to AV Club’s “Pop Pilgrims”, and after only a couple of listens I found it hard to get out of my head. It’s an ode to open spaces and desert places, but is it about the inability to escape home or a song of devotion to it?

VIDEO:

The Joy Formidable – “Austere”
One of my favorite bands from the last few years returns to my list in 2011 with this song, an overwhelming anthem despite being absorbed by a relentless, wordless extended finale, truly the “Big Roar” that the album title promises.

VIDEO:

Foster the People – “Call It What You Want”
Yeah, these are the “Pumped Up Kicks” kids. This song carries their trademark lightheartedness, but it also doubles as a pre-emptive strike against those sudden critics who would roll their eyes at the monotony of such moments of radio omnipresence.

VIDEO:

Kenna – “Chains”
Kenna is an “outside-the-box” artist that is well worth the side trip. This track is his best to date, a roadmap to freedom from whatever’s got you tied down, assuming you simply find the right perspective.

VIDEO:

Ninja Sex Party- “Dinosaur Laser Fight”
Just a couple of foul-mouthed losers fucking around.

VIDEO:
The video is saved by animation from YouTube great Egoraptor. Maybe saved was too strong a word?

Neon Trees – “Everybody Talks”
I’ve got nothing flowery or erudite to add here, except maybe for the word “erudite” itself. It’s pop rock, it’s catchy, and you’re being kind of an asshole for dismissing them. They are either your cup of tea, or you are in danger of spraining your pinky.

VIDEO:
This is audio only. No official video for this one yet.

Outasight – “Figure 8”
Ever feel like you’re in a rut? Before you dismiss the white-kid-trying-R&B thing, ask yourself if you might like a change of pace. The video kinda hurts more than it helps in my opinion, but the song is still hard to hate.

VIDEO:
Ouch! This kid’s moves are a little on the embarrassing/90’s R&B video side.

Black Panther f. Meredith DiMenna – “Heavy Mental Factory”
I’m assuming that Black Panther is the source of the underlying music, as the song hinges heavily on the featured guest singer. It’s a welcome variation on laidback, melodic half-hop. It’s not a song you commit to memory, but it’s the welcome music in the background when you get tired of your regularly scheduled playlist.

VIDEO:
Uh… so this is the only link I could find. That intro crap… no idea what that is about.

The Parlor Mob – “Into the Sun”
It’s tolerable-despite-its-youth rock, just crunchy enough to make you feel a little edgy again. It’s hopeful enough, anthemic for all those of you who are waiting on a certain ship to come in.

VIDEO:

The Static Jacks – “Into the Sun”
Yes, that’s the second “Into the Sun” on this list. Like the song above, it’s also about stepping forward, but this time it’s more urgent, laced less with angst and more with longing and desperation.

VIDEO:

Mac Miller – “Knock Knock”
“I feel like a million bucks, but my money don’t really feel like I do.” No shit, you little bastard. Difference between me and this kid is that he’s likely to change his tune in the near future. This song lifts it’s 50’s hook like a poodle skirt. It’s white boy rap at it’s least polite or mature, but it’s occasionally clever and laidback enough to stand out in a sub-genre that’s often scarier than the McCarthy-era itself.

VIDEO:

M83 – “Midnight City”
At first listen, I assumed this to be an instrumental track. And despite the eventual arrival of some ethereal lyrics, I can’t say I know any of the words. But this is one of those times where words aren’t that necessary. Alternately mute and pulsing, this song remains haunting until the sudden emergence of a movingly optimistic saxophone. Don’t cut out early.

VIDEO:
What if the Children of the Corn weren’t evil?

Funeral Party – “New York Moves to the Sound of L.A.”
This is another great band that came to my attention in 2011. It’s legitimate rock, sung/occasionally screeched over the band’s shoulder without checking to see if you are keeping up. A song that picks at trends and the trendy, it might be mistaken for a simple West Coast ode by someone breezing by the title on the way to manicure their dog. (Honorably mention: I’m also including a link to “Finale”, an even better track, but iTunes tells me that was technically released in 2010 or I’d have chosen it in-goddamned-stead.)

VIDEO:

The Airborne Toxic Event – “Numb”
This band seems to me to specialize in songs about loves that either “got away” or “want you to get away”. In retrospect, this is the whiniest song on this list. The flavor of twenty-somethings angst is very different than that of those in their teens. And it’s worth a listen, if for no other reason than an experiment in learning to tell them apart.

VIDEO:
Band wants you to know they have a chick who holds a few keys down sometimes.

Rival Sons – “Pressure and Time”
And for the 30+ set, there’s still hope. There’s still plenty of rawr for your rock out there. I mean, pressure and time is what forms actual rocks from minerals, get it? Of course not, school was too far away for you. But here’s your daily dose of howling, wailing and thumping. Enjoy!

VIDEO:

Nero – “Promises”
This is dub-step made palatable. Unless you hate music with an engineer involved, that is. This track is a paradox: an up-tempo tale of disappointment that’s not at odds with itself. You can tap your foot to it, unless you’re the asshole already busy with your heart-stomping.

VIDEO:
Some weird sci-fi “story” here. Just saw this video for the first time today, so… sorry.

I Fight Dragons – “The Geeks Will Inherit the Earth”
“Geek culture” has become a kind of chic thing that’s as misunderstood by those that now “embrace” it as those that used to “beat it up for it’s lunch money”. This song seems to seek out that strange neutral zone between genuine geekdom and being an authentic, chick-banging band. This song has plenty of studio polish and just enough video game samples to sound like a missing piece of the Scott Pilgrim soundtrack.

VIDEO:
No official video yet here either.

The Aquabats – “Shark Fighter”
As best as I can tell, the Aquabats are the superheroes of the world the B-52s invented. While it’s kooky and chipper, “Shark Fighter” is a surprisingly thorough tale of a man who fights sharks, not for money, but to avenge a tragically lost love. It’s a themesong to the saddest camp TV show never produced, and one of my favorite fucking songs period. I fully expect to be alone on this one.

VIDEO:
This song is better than anything you will ever do. Sadly, the video isn’t online.

The Decemberists – “This Is Why We Fight”
This song is a bleak study of the necessities of war, or perhaps even loss itself. It’s a close to folk as I often venture, but the pervasive mood on this track seems to distinguish it as another genre. The only hope that seems to be found is the hint of respite that follows such fatal undertakings. See what I did there? Just trying to lighten things up a bit.

VIDEO:

Tech N9ne (f. A Bunch of Other Rappers) – “Worldwide Choppers”
This is the hip-hop equivalent of the Olympics. As the title implies, it’s an assemblage of rappers from across the planet (most from the US, though), each trying to outpace the last with his own blistering run. In an era when my love for rap has begun to wane, this was a great shot in the arm. An illegal, disqualifying-if-discovered steroid to the… whatever gland hip-hop comes from.

VIDEO:
I wanted a “lyrics” video, this is the best I could find. There’s an ad that hovers over the left side for the duration, sorry about that.

Honorable Mention:

Justice – “Civilization”
A great 2011 song in its own right, but I wanted to make special mention about the video. It’s got a fairly clear, perhaps controversial message to it. What do you think?

VIDEO:

Honorable Mention 2:

Bad Lip Reading – Various Songs
In 2011 this mystery group began recording their own tracks over popular songs/videos. In essence, they are entirely different songs and tunes, but just happen to match up with the mouth movements of the speaker/singer in each video. The result is quirky and fucking hilarious. Just go to their site and spend a few minutes poking around:

in * Featured, art, music

, , , ,

Actual Information: Car Insurance

0
by on September 14, 2011 at 9:08 PM

“Actual Information” is another of my ongoing columns, an attempt to produce material that’s a little more practical for my army of reader(s). I’m not wasting time citing sources, as all this info comes from my own dwindling stores of knowledge. Expect an occasional error or outright lie, just to keep you on your toes. This column is like Wikipedia, without the pesky interference of other know-it-alls. Now ring the bell. School’s in, sucka.

*****

For most of us, car insurance is just another bill. The price one pays for living in the traffic-clogged, death-topian murdercloud we call “the city”. We don’t think of insurance as a benefit–we’re too busy trying to minimize such trivial bills so we can focus on that soul-crushing mortgage, finance that ski trip, or finally get that laser-scoped deer rifle back out of hawk. Insurance is grown-up and boring. The only time it’s not a nap-inducing topic is when we hear the magic words:

“Customers that switched saved and average of $400 per year.”

Of course the ones who saved switched. But this is “spin”, and it’s not even that subtle. People waste that 15 minutes by calling, only to find out they are not one of the lucky few to “win” the GEICO Lotto. The magic for most of us ends with the talking lizard. Cost and value are two separate things and they don’t always come packaged together. Here are a few things to think about while waiting for your next tow truck:

In recent years, insurance companies have been able to “prove” a link between your credit score and your ability to take proper care of your car. While this smacks of discrimination to everyone except entitled assholes, it is legally supported. Insurance companies balance the risk of taking on “safe clients” for a smaller fee versus taking on you road-ragers for an extra large (pepperoni!) slice of your payday. In some ways, they want to weed out the risk (“fuck off!”) and in others, they want you to agree to the wallet-rape (“get fucked!”) so they can inflate your price like a Macy’s balloon.

Another measure of insurance that goes unnoticed by the masses is coverage. There are different coverage levels beyond “bare-ass minimum needed to keep me legal” to “insure my poodle’s diamond encrusted sidecar”. Your agent says, “buy as much insurance as you can afford”. Until crunch time (heh), most of us tend to underestimate what that amount actually is. I mean, how often can you negotiate one of your bills? It’s not just “poor” people that go with minimum coverage either. There’s a class of “comfortable” drivers out there who are simply insistent that they don’t need anything more than what is required. The illusion for these folks is that if they are safe, there will never be a surprise they can’t outmaneuver. They are playing chicken, gambling on the expectation that they never get plucked.

One final thing to keep in mind is the quality of your insurance company. While the reputation of the big insurers changes wildly between your friends and family that have had run-ins (heh) with customer service, there is in fact a simple litmus test that’s more reliable: keep an eye out for your insurer’s TV commercials. When do they air? If your current company runs its ads during the day between Judge Judy and commercials for local chiropractor’s office… you probably have “shitty” insurance. What channel airs the commercials? NBC might be a safe bet. CBS assumes you’re retired, and retired folks get the best deals, (wrinkled) hands down. MTV assumes you’re in your early 20s and thus, have enough money in the change holder for your next downpayment.

Other quick facts:

- In many states, you can opt out of buying car insurance by posting a bond with the state (in the neighborhood of $50,000). Of course, no one has that kind of money to throw around, but it’s kind of the ultimate test for those of you who insist you’re wreck-less (heh).

- Adding a sixteen year old to your policy might seem like paycheck-icide, but… that’s helping your (Dale Earnhardt) junior drivers build a record of insurance that will really help lower their prices in the future. This sacrifice is only for those of you who want your kids to have it slightly easier as they (hopefully) leave the nest. Little bastards.

- When getting an insurance quote, you can’t really fudge the make of your car or your driving record. Tips: underestimate your annual mileage/commute time. Lying about an odometer reading is fairly safe, though if you get in an accident they check it regardless of fault and adjust accordingly. Never volunteer info about a ticket or crash they don’t seem to find in the system. Asking for your quote without offering your Social Security number will always result in a much higher (and inaccurate if you actually buy) quote. This is where they hit your credit and lower your premium a little or a lot once the answer comes back.

- And don’t let your policy expire. Forty years of uninterrupted insurance followed by a two week mistake will fuck everything up. Like meth.

, , , , , , , , , ,

Open Letters: Attention Megalomaniacs

0
by on March 13, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“Open Letters” is another of my ongoing columns, a catch-all collection of not-quite-hate mail addressed to those in a position to make best use of it. It’s not just a complaining rant but also advice. It’s advice that is unwarranted and likely unwelcome–but still potentially valuable.

*****

Introduction: While I struggle to make my posts timeless, today’s post is indeed topical. It’s a reaction to the events happening at this specific moment. America can no longer remain silent about the oppression happening outside our safe bubble! What follows is a message to those who would seek to disregard the freedoms of others.

You often hide behind foreign symbols, but don’t think the rest of us aren’t aware of what you are. Though you have no more real power than those near you, you have allowed yourself to become obsessed. You make this world a dangerous place for the rest of humanity.

Sometimes I even question if you see the signs and just disregard them, fueled by careless abandon. You clearly ignore both law and a common sense of humanity. Eventual ruin seems to be your destination, which would be fitting, were it not for the chaos you leave in your wake.

So it’s up to us to strap in and deal with your ego-fueled decisions?

I say no. No longer.

And I’ve got a message for you: There are those of us who are not so weak. Some that will not sit idle. We will not follow your lead, except to give chase. We’ve got your number. You might dismiss us with a laugh. You might flip us the proverbial finger.

But in the end, you will look out your window to see our face: the face of retribution. For the first time since you began your “reign”, you will experience the wheels of justice. Take a look around! Revolutions are taking place outside your door. Are you scared? You should be.

And if you ever cut me off again, I will hit your car, insurance be damned!

, , , , ,

A New Leash: Part Two

0
by on March 9, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“A New Leash” is an unusual column, even for this site. It’s my attempt to document some of the conversations I have with my Chihuahua named “Brownie”. As most of you know, he and I have been looking for a project to do together for a while now. Enjoy.

*****

DAVE: Who wants a treat?

BROWNIE: There’s no one else here. Clearly you mean me.

DAVE: Oh. Well, alright then. I just like to watch your reaction.

BROWNIE: You want me to run around in circles? Beg?

DAVE: It is kind fun, yeah.

BROWNIE: That doesn’t get old though?

DAVE: We think it’s kinda cute, actually.

BROWNIE: What do you mean “we”?

DAVE: You know, your mother and me.

BROWNIE: But she’s not around. You mean “just you” think it’s cute, don’t you?

DAVE: Well… sure. I guess I do.

BROWNIE: Then just say the word “cute”. You can think your dog is cute without any judgment from me.

DAVE: Really?

BROWNIE: Of course. I mean, I drag my ass across middle of the living room carpet. Right in front of you both.

DAVE: Heh heh. That’s funny too.

BROWNIE: You mean cute?

DAVE: Oh yeah. Cute. Sorry.

BROWNIE: Now give me my damn treat before I leave one for you behind the couch.

, , , , , ,

Philo 101: Context Messaging

0
by on March 5, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“Philo101″ is another of my ongoing columns, exploring the (not usually very) big questions about life. Sometimes the goal will be to provoke thought, to prompt discussion or to even provide some weak-ass motivation.

*****

Unless you’re a Picard (no hair) or a Kirk (fake hair), you occasional find yourself touching the hair on top of your head. At some point, you’ve touched the hair of a loved one. I’m willing to bet that if it looked clean, you’d be willing to touch a friend’s head, perhaps even a well-groomed stranger.

But the moment that a hair departs its native head, something curious happens. It becomes, in scientific terms, “gross”. Okay, if a rogue hair lands safely outside of your salad, it might not be utterly disgusting. But still, we have a general disdain for decoifennated curls.

One moment, you are a stylist gently navigating a stranger’s head with your bare hands. The next moment, you are sweeping up discarded locks with a sanitized dustpan.

And this Icktobersfest isn’t limited to just hair, but all kinds of bio byproducts: nail clippings, dead skin, etc. And let’s not even go near (see what I did there?) the whole category of “fluids”. But in the cases of friends and family, we’re perfectly willing to shake hands, rub shoulders and pat heads. It’s curious, how when these parts become separated, we almost immediately need plastic gloves to go near such things.

It’s nothing more than timing that makes the same thing touchable or torchable.

Let me go broader here. Imagine a beautiful butterfly lands on the tip of your finger. You marvel at the colorful patterns and gush about the beauty of nature. But the moment some sadistic 12 year old pops those pretty wings off, there’s nothing on that creepy-crawly to keep his unknowing sister from screaming.

Yeah, this is one of those “perspective” posts. You got me. But consider how much in life you find repulsive, and consider a context in which it was perfectly fine. It’s the key to negotiating a lot of situations, only the least of which is spring cleaning. It’s great if you find yourself at the in-laws and suddenly feel like you’re on “Fear Factor” (there’s a timely reference!). You can apply the same principle to people, things and even ideas.

Except reality TV “stars”. I see no upside to meeting them and not fleeing instantly to Cambodia.

, , , , , , ,

A New Leash: Part One

0
by on March 1, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“A New Leash” is an unusual column, even for this site. It’s my attempt to document some of the conversations I have with my Chihuahua named “Brownie”. As most of you know, he and I have been looking for a project to do together for a while now. Enjoy.

*****

DAVE: Who’s a good boy?

BROWNIE: You mean me? Or do you actually want an answer?

DAVE: Oh. I just meant… that you’re being good. And I appreciate it!

BROWNIE: Then why are you asking?

DAVE: I don’t know. Guess I never really thought about it. Stupid human thing, I suppose.

BROWNIE: And you’re the one with the big, complicated brain… amazing.

DAVE: Hey! Look, I was complimenting you. Why are you turning against me?

BROWNIE: Again with the questions. You want me to answer this one, right?

DAVE: Sure. Yes. Speak boy, speak!

BROWNIE: Okay, first off… the baby talk? It demeans both of us. Like the damn “sweaters” you let her put me in. Second, I’m not turning against you. Not everything I do has to be “biting the hand that feeds”. Last time I checked, I had my own mind and was allowed to speak it.

DAVE: No one’s telling you not too. In fact, this is the most we’ve ever talked. It’s kinda weird actually.

BROWNIE: Where are you going?

DAVE: I want to record this, hold on.

BROWNIE: If you try to tape me, you’re only gonna get sounds of me sniffing the microphone or barking at the mailman.

DAVE: You saying this is all in my head?

BROWNIE: My brain’s the size of a walnut. You think I have that much imagination? I dream of peeing on things, for shit’s sake.

DAVE: Whoa! You curse?

BROWNIE: Guess where I picked that skill up, motherfucker?

, , , , , ,

Philo 101: Comparative Cookery

0
by on February 22, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“Philo101″ is another of my ongoing columns, exploring the (not usually very) big questions about life. Sometimes the goal will be to provoke thought, to prompt discussion or to even provide some weak-ass motivation.

*****

You look down at your freshly-inked traffic ticket in disgust. Just how many lucky assholes blew past that cop before he singled you out? How many of them were going faster than you were? And while Officer Nolove wrote out your ticket, you could plainly see other drivers playing NASCAR, knowing the cop was occupied with keeping you from catching the quarterfinals of Idol.

At some point, we each break the laws of the road. Yes you do, shut your mouth and remain inside the vehicle.

You see others as escapees, but yourself as a victim. If you are a pot, you can only see the kettle, there’s no way to make out your (possibly racist?) reflection in its black exterior. So much of what we observe is our perspective. Knowing that, it’s easy to see why so many instances of the pot/kettle conundrum find their way into our regularly scheduled programming.

Pointing out a flaw isn’t innately wrong. Despite your background with the subject, you do indeed have “the right” to speak whatever piece you’ve brought with you. Just because you aren’t blameless, doesn’t mean you can’t call someone else on their bullshit. One’s hypocrisy does not suddenly make truth relative. Your mistakes don’t mean you are incapable of separating right from wrong.

Sure, your argument against drunk driving might not be as persuasive if you have a DUI on file. But it doesn’t make drunk driving any less dangerous, illegal or amazing to watch via COPS’ dashboard cam. There are times when speaking up, and calling someone out can trump the worry of the fingers pointing back your way.

When you point out a less-than-favorable fact about someone else, you should at least be prepared for the inevitable kettle call. It’s a defense mechanism, and it’s fueled by people’s often-unrealistic need to see fairness in all things. It’s meant to say, “Why listen to this pot-head, he is just another piece of cookware himself?”

But what else is hidden in these replies? The pot/kettle defense isn’t just a reversal, but it’s often an admission of guilt. That’s why avoiding its use yourself is often wise, even though others will do so with all the conviction of a punkass toddler entering time-out.

Pots and kettles might share an exterior paint job, but they still serve different purposes. There are circumstances where the “kettle” risks boiling over and ruining dinner for everyone. Know the signs, or… learn to spot the steam.

(And yes, it’s shitty metaphor day.)

, , , , ,

The Mindfield: Cults

0
by on February 17, 2011 at 6:15 AM

“The Mindfield” posts are hilarious, hastily-written, 250 word snack pack sneak attacks designed to quickly return you to your precious channel-surfing, belly-button-lint-collecting, breathing-because-I-need-this-life-giving-oxygen you-time.

*****

You hear the word “cult”, and images of suicidal / homicidal sugarplums begin to dance in your head. But every major political, philosophical or religious movement began as one. Every fully recognized belief system was once looked down on by the big kids. But is the idea of a cult as dangerous as common conception? Why do we only focus only on the scary, the hairy and the incendiary?

Because they get the most coverage.

You ever blown up a bus, or a clinic or a pack of dinosaurs in tweed jackets that tried to followed you into Barnes and Noble? You do that and you garner more wagging chins than the current Mrs. Affleck. This small-yet-psychotic slice of the cult community is called a “splinter group” after all… they’re small, painful and go against the grain.

When we aren’t throwing the word “cult” at a group of activists, we use it as a nametag for very specific factions of modern culture. The 21st century is proving to be pretty damn “niche”. There are “cult” films, music (“The Cult” cult). The word is losing its meaning.

The term itself comes from the same root word as “culture”, something we’re not nearly as sacred of. Your city has a culture. Your gym class has a culture. Your damn yogurt. And on the subject of root words, I’ve got another for you: “grassroots”. As in, “the Super-Pals got their start as a grassroots organization”. See? Change the term, and suddenly, everything’s peachy.

, , , , ,

1 2 3 31 32